On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:38:42 +0100 Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:00:47PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > Idea 1: remove this whole check; debhelper >= 9.20120909 is already
> > satisfied in oldstable, so this doesn't serve any purpose any more.
>
> I
Am 30.09.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:38:42 +0100 Santiago Vila wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:00:47PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>>
>>> Idea 1: remove this whole check; debhelper >= 9.20120909 is already
>>> satisfied in oldstable, so
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 03:00:47PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Idea 1: remove this whole check; debhelper >= 9.20120909 is already
> satisfied in oldstable, so this doesn't serve any purpose any more.
I think this is the best thing to do. No need to find the "right fix"
for something which
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:29:57 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The regexp quoted by Sven is used in this way:
>
> $1 > 9 or ($1 == 9 and $2 >= '20120909') or error('debhelper 9.20120909 or
> later required');
>
> So what is really required here is to check that this is true:
>
>
Dear Perl maintainers:
This package has not had a maintainer upload in some time, so maybe it
will eventually need to be NMUed again.
Would be possible for you to suggest a good fix for this bug?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837745#10
The regexp quoted by Sven is used in
5 matches
Mail list logo