Bug#582925: Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-27 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
Control: reassign 839218 nama Control: retitle 839218 nama: FTBFS because of perl's lack of stack reference counting On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:33:29AM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote: > Control: tags -1 patch > > Hi Niko, > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > >

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-27 Thread Balint Reczey
Control: tags -1 patch Hi Niko, On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:23 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > >> I'll also work a bit on reducing the test further when I find the time. > > I got it down to this: > > my $a = [ 0, 1 ]; >

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-26 Thread Niko Tyni
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > I'll also work a bit on reducing the test further when I find the time. I got it down to this: my $a = [ 0, 1 ]; sub f { my $arg = shift; my @a1 = @$a; @$a = @a1; return(); } map{ f($_) } @$a; This looks to

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-24 Thread Balint Reczey
Control: forwarded -1 https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131054 Control: tags -1 upstream On 03/24/2017 10:30 AM, Niko Tyni wrote: >> Should I forward it to Perl upstream? > That would be nice, thanks. I'm sure they'd also prefer a minimal test case, > but maybe the assert details are

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-24 Thread Niko Tyni
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 03:51:45PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:05:43PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: > > > >> It looks like not all regression are fixed after the re-implementation > >> and the one

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-23 Thread Balint Reczey
Hi Niko, On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:05:43PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: > >> It looks like not all regression are fixed after the re-implementation >> and the one affecting nama is one of them. > > Some effort on a reduced

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-22 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:05:43PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: > It looks like not all regression are fixed after the re-implementation > and the one affecting nama is one of them. Some effort on a reduced test case would have been appreciated; the nama code base is rather big. While I haven't

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-21 Thread Balint Reczey
Hi Gregor, On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:36 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> > This looks like a problem in perl itself possibly causing random crashes >> > elsewhere, too. >> Does this problem also show up with 5.24.1-1

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-21 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > This looks like a problem in perl itself possibly causing random crashes > > elsewhere, too. > Does this problem also show up with 5.24.1-1 in testing and/or > 5.24.1-2 in unstable? Looking at the upstream ticket at

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-21 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: retitle -1 Perl 5.24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault # or "Perl 5, version 24, ..." On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:14:53 +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: > Control: reassign -1 perl 5.24.0~rc3-1 > Control: affects -1 nama > Control: retitle -1 perl: Perl 24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault > This

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2017-03-21 Thread Balint Reczey
Control: reassign -1 perl 5.24.0~rc3-1 Control: affects -1 nama Control: retitle -1 perl: Perl 24 makes nama FTBFS due to segfault Dear Perl Maintainers, On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:09:01 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: nama > Version: 1.208-1 > Severity: serious > Justification:

Bug#839218: nama: FTBFS: Failed 1/7 test programs. 0/91 subtests failed.Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 57.

2016-09-30 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: nama Version: 1.208-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, nama fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: [..]