On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:55:26AM +0200, Jan Mojzis wrote:
> > "extremely outdated"?
> >
> > This sounds like a hack from ~ 20 years ago when people realized that
> > running several programs at the same time as nobody does not isolate
> > them from each other.
> >
> > Much better solutions
> "extremely outdated"?
>
> This sounds like a hack from ~ 20 years ago when people realized that
> running several programs at the same time as nobody does not isolate
> them from each other.
>
> Much better solutions for restricting what a process can or cannot do
> are now available.
>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:33:14AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, at 06:56, Jan Mojzis wrote:
> > >I read manpage on github, but did not understood, what exactly this
> > > program provides. Can it replace creation system users for dropping
> > > privileges?
> >
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, at 06:56, Jan Mojzis wrote:
> >I read manpage on github, but did not understood, what exactly this
> > program provides. Can it replace creation system users for dropping
> > privileges?
>
> It's doesn't create users.
> It only drops privileges (extremesetuidgid) or sets
>I read manpage on github, but did not understood, what exactly this
> program provides. Can it replace creation system users for dropping
> privileges?
It's doesn't create users.
It only drops privileges (extremesetuidgid) or sets $UID/$GID env. variables
(extremeenvuidgid).
For example:
[2016-10-17 20:15] Jan Mojzis
>
> part text/plain1045
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jan Mojzis
>
> * Package name: extremetools
> Version : 20161017
> Upstream Author : Jan Mojžíš
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Jan Mojzis wrote:
> > It appears there is copies of GPLv3 code from NaCL in the source. I'm
> not a
>
> > lawyer, but I think that is making the distribution as "public domain"
>
> > pretty much illegal? Or am I missing something here?
>
>
>
> It appears there is copies of GPLv3 code from NaCL in the source. I'm not a
> lawyer, but I think that is making the distribution as "public domain"
> pretty much illegal? Or am I missing something here?
Hello,
NaCl is not GPL3.
It's public-domain https://nacl.cr.yp.to/features.html[1]
Jan
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 19:57:53 +0100 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
> Jan Mojzis  wrote:
> [...]
It appears there is copies of GPLv3 code from NaCL in the source. I'm not a
lawyer, but I think that is making the distribution as "public domain"
pretty much
You've already commented the silent failure mode, so it's not that hard
to find.
As for 'is it problem?', why do you think I pointed these things out?
Perhaps you have good reasons to do things in an unusual way, but in
the absence of comments to explain them I infer that you either don't
know or
On Monday 17 of October 2016 19:57:53 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Jan Mojzis wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm going to maintain the package using collab-maint.
> > I need sponsor.
> >
> > Debian package:
> > - has autotest
> > - is using debhelper
> > - is using git-dpm
Jan Mojzis wrote:
[...]
> I'm going to maintain the package using collab-maint.
> I need sponsor.
>
> Debian package:
> - has autotest
> - is using debhelper
> - is using git-dpm https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/extr
emetools.git
> - lintian clean (no
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:15:04 +0200
Jan Mojzis wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jan Mojzis
>
> * Package name: extremetools
> Version : 20161017
> Upstream Author : Jan Mojžíš
> * URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Mojzis
* Package name: extremetools
Version : 20161017
Upstream Author : Jan Mojžíš
* URL : https://github.com/janmojzis/extremetools
* License : public-domain
14 matches
Mail list logo