On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:18:55PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> No, the “certainly did” and “worked fine” bits are wrong.
>
> And that's not just me, we've had users report it, Philip Hands saw it
> as well. So no it did *NOT* work (in the specific case where it actually
> matters).
Yes, turns
Lennart Sorensen (2016-10-31):
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:28:57PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > The (re)addition of InRelease support broke debootstrap(-udeb) in a d-i
> > context. The sed|tr|sed dance doesn't kill the final newline, which
> > leads to a BAD signature.
>
> The one I propose
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 05:28:57PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: debootstrap-udeb
> Version: 1.0.85
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The (re)addition of InRelease support broke debootstrap(-udeb) in a d-i
> context. The sed|tr|sed dance doesn't kill the fi
Package: debootstrap-udeb
Version: 1.0.85
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The (re)addition of InRelease support broke debootstrap(-udeb) in a d-i
context. The sed|tr|sed dance doesn't kill the final newline, which
leads to a BAD signature.
My original proposal was to use h
4 matches
Mail list logo
