All I know is "one may have noticed () vs. (())". I don't know how they
got there. So I am not the best person to write about it.
On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 12:22 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> BH> The extra parentheses have no special meaning.
>
> Well please document how they got there at least.
As I explained, that program did it:
> BH> What the documentation ought to mention is that a thread's name can
> BH> be
BH> The extra parentheses have no special meaning.
Well please document how they got there at least.
BH> What the documentation ought to mention is that a thread's name can
BH> be overridden using prctl(PR_SET_NAME, ...). Care to send a patch?
I have no kernel knowledge.
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: retitle -1 proc.txt does not mention that task names can be overridden
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 07:09 +0800, 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: linux-doc-4.8
> Version: 4.8.5-1
> Severity: wishlist
> File:
Package: linux-doc-4.8
Version: 4.8.5-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-4.8/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt.gz
One only sees
tcomm filename of the executable
But no explanation of () vs (())
$ perl -anwle 'print $F[1]' /proc/[0-9]*/stat|sort -u|head
((sd-pam))
5 matches
Mail list logo
