Bug#844524: disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail under disorderfs

2020-04-14 Thread Chris Lamb
forwarded 844524 https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/disorderfs/-/issues/3 thanks I've forwarded this to Salsa/upstream here: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/disorderfs/-/issues/3 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org /

Bug#844524: disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail under disorderfs

2018-11-26 Thread Chris Lamb
Ximin Luo wrote: > disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail > under disorderfs Hm, I wonder if this was fixed in: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/disorderfs/commit/39e29c4ef96319a4c716832a73ad5fd62ed9ff75 … via #898287, released in 0.5.3. Regards, --

Bug#844524: disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail under disorderfs

2016-11-17 Thread Ximin Luo
Chris Lamb: >> disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work > > Are we sure it's directly rewinddir? ISTR FUSE does funny things with > inode numbers and — at a very quick glance — might mean that things > like (d->d_ino == st1.st_ino) are misleading > What sorts of funny things are you referring to? My

Bug#844524: disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail under disorderfs

2016-11-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Ximin Luo wrote: > > FUSE does funny things with inode numbers > > What sorts of funny things are you referring to? Sorry, that's all I remember — I could very well be wrong; I was just throwing out a half-remembered hunch in case it was helpful. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chri

Bug#844524: disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail under disorderfs

2016-11-17 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi, > disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work Are we sure it's directly rewinddir? ISTR FUSE does funny things with inode numbers and — at a very quick glance — might mean that things like (d->d_ino == st1.st_ino) are misleading Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'`

Bug#844524: disorderfs: rewinddir doesn't work, causing glibc tests to fail under disorderfs

2016-11-16 Thread Ximin Luo
Package: disorderfs Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, See the attached test program. You should see something like this: /tmp/debrepro.LJec0mD2n2/first/disorderfs$ gcc test.c && ./a.out; ls -lad tst-dir* && rmdir tst-dir* haven't found new directory "/tmp/debrepro.LJec0mD2n2/f