Bug#845085: docker.io: Some commands do not work on some images with kernel version 4.8

2016-11-23 Thread Pitxyoki
Hi Ian, Thanks for your attention to this. I just tried out the following combinations: Linux Kernel v4.7: vsyscall=emulate vsyscall=native vsyscall=none Linux Kernel v4.8 vsyscall=emulate vsyscall=native vsyscall=none The commands work every time, except when vsyscall=none is set, for both ker

Bug#845085: docker.io: Some commands do not work on some images with kernel version 4.8

2016-11-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:17 +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 09:57 +, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > > > > While using Docker, some commands on some images stopped working. > > For > > example: > > > >   $ docker run -it --rm centos:centos6  bash > > This does not work. It

Bug#845085: docker.io: Some commands do not work on some images with kernel version 4.8

2016-11-22 Thread Ian Campbell
On Sun, 2016-11-20 at 09:57 +, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > While using Docker, some commands on some images stopped working. For > example: > >   $ docker run -it --rm centos:centos6  bash > This does not work. It always returns with code 139: > >   $ echo $? > 139 FYI something similar

Bug#845085: docker.io: Some commands do not work on some images with kernel version 4.8

2016-11-20 Thread Tianon Gravi
20 November 2016 at 01:57, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote: > While using Docker, some commands on some images stopped working. For example: > > $ docker run -it --rm centos:centos6 bash > This does not work. It always returns with code 139: > > $ echo $? > 139 > > > ...but the following does

Bug#845085: docker.io: Some commands do not work on some images with kernel version 4.8

2016-11-20 Thread Luís Picciochi Oliveira
Package: docker.io Version: 1.11.2~ds1-6 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, While using Docker, some commands on some images stopped working. For example: $ docker run -it --rm centos:centos6 bash This does not work. It always returns with code 139: $ echo $? 139 ...but the following