Bug#848316: [pkg-go] Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-20 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 10:41:23 AM AEDT TFAUCK wrote: > Initially I thought that maintainers of etcd 2.0 which are also > maintainers for packages relative to go were going to do it, but I may > be wrong there. I'm not sure what are you trying to say... Maintainers (upstream developers) of

Bug#848316: [pkg-go] Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-19 Thread TFAUCK
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:54:30 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Friday, 13 January 2017 1:57:33 PM AEDT TFAUCK wrote: > > So what do we do for that issue ? > > Hopefully fix it eventually by updating "etcd" package... > > > > who's going to decide if there is a > > need for

Bug#848316: [pkg-go] Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-13 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Friday, 13 January 2017 1:57:33 PM AEDT TFAUCK wrote: > So what do we do for that issue ? Hopefully fix it eventually by updating "etcd" package... > who's going to decide if there is a > need for new package or just and upgrade ? That would be me... :) The matter is quite simple: if my

Bug#848316: [pkg-go] Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-13 Thread TFAUCK
On Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:50:53 +1100 Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 12:03:44 AM AEDT Potter, Tim wrote: > > Hi there. I've currently got someone working on a etcd3 package - still > > tossing up whether to create a new binary package and keep etcd as > >

Bug#848316: [pkg-go] Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-05 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Wednesday, 4 January 2017 12:03:44 AM AEDT Potter, Tim wrote: > Hi there. I've currently got someone working on a etcd3 package - still > tossing up whether to create a new binary package and keep etcd as > implicitly version 2 only. That's what I'm leaning to at the moment. I think we

Bug#848316: [pkg-go] Bug#848316: etcd: I saw that A new upstream version is available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ?

2017-01-03 Thread Potter, Tim
On 16 Dec 2016, at 8:04 PM, debian wrote: > > Source: etcd > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > On https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/etcd I saw that a new upstream version is > available: 3.0.15 - Is this possible to upgrade ? Hi there. I've currently got someone