Le 10/01/2017 à 12:43, George Bateman a écrit :
> That makes sense and I don't have an issue with that; I only want it to
> be clear in the description what package I have to install/depend on.
You are absolutely right, I even forgot about this subtlety myself ;)
I'll modify the package
That makes sense and I don't have an issue with that; I only want it to be
clear in the description what package I have to install/depend on. Copying
what you've said or something similar into the two package descriptions
would be ideal.
George Bateman.
On 10 Jan 2017 11:33, "Emmanuel Bourg"
Depending on openjfx instead of libopenjfx-java is the intended usage of
the package. libopenjfx-java contains only the library, and openjfx
integrates it with the default JRE. This split was necessary to optimize
the size of the package (openjfx is arch any, if it contained the JavaFX
jars it
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 09:38:09PM +, George Bateman wrote:
> An Ant build script for a Java package intended to be used with Oracle
> Java would not build, as it could not find the openjfx library. I had to
> modify the Ant script to add /usr/share/java/openjfx/jre/lib/ext/jfxrt.jar
> to its
Package: libopenjfx-java
Version: 8u111-b14-1
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
An Ant build script for a Java package intended to be used with Oracle
Java would not build, as it could not find the openjfx library. I had to
modify the Ant script
5 matches
Mail list logo
