Control: tags 849782 pending
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote...
> APKs can be a totally standard JAR with a valid JAR signature, and they
> can be assembled with any tool that can make a valid ZIP archive with a
> valid JAR signature. The vast majority of APKs are made with the same
> toolchain, e.
So the test result files were cluttering things, and are small in a
tarball, so I removed them from here:
https://verification.f-droid.org/*.apk.file.txt
https://verification.f-droid.org/*.apk.file.unsigned.txt
And they are now attached.
file-libmagic-tests.tar.bz2
Description: application/b
Control: tags 849782 upstream
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote...
> I'm not sure exactly where and when or if things changed. The essential
> part of the bug report is that valid APK files are being inconsistently
> detected as either JAR or ZIP.
Now I get it, it's "why are these files detected dif
I'm not sure exactly where and when or if things changed. The essential
part of the bug report is that valid APK files are being inconsistently
detected as either JAR or ZIP. APK files are always JARs and always
ZIPs. If they are not being detected as APK, then JAR would make the
most sense, IM
Control: tags 849782 moreinfo
Control: merge 849782 849783
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote...
> Previously, with 1:5.29-2, APK files seemed to be always detected as JAR
> files.
Please clarify. The "tmp" (md5:67b44d779578cbddf6e17db92290e987) gets detected
as Zip in all versions of file supported i
Package: file
Version: 1:5.29-2
Severity: important
Android APK files are the standard app package for Android. They are a
slightly custom version of JAR format. Basically, they are JAR files
with standard files included in them, a custom padding method, and now a
new custom signature format.
6 matches
Mail list logo