On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 02:45 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > They match closely enough for module building, so I think bpfcc's
> > version check might not be correct.
> >
>
> It's OK, I'll report a bug to bpfcc upstream.
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> They match closely enough for module building, so I think bpfcc's
> version check might not be correct.
>
It's OK, I'll report a bug to bpfcc upstream.
--
Liang Guo
http://guoliang.me/
Control: reassign -1 bpfcc-tools
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 02:14 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Control: reassign -1 src:linux 4.8.11-1
> > Control: severity -1 normal
> > Control: tag -1
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:19 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 src:linux 4.8.11-1
> Control: severity -1 normal
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> The signed and unsigned kernels have exactly the same code. The only
> way they can differe in behaviour is on a
Control: reassign -1 src:linux 4.8.11-1
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 09:24 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi, I found bpfcc-tools don't work on linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64 andÂ
On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 09:24 +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64
> Severity: serious
>
I don't think this severity is justified, when the regular kernels work fine
with it.
> Hi, I found bpfcc-tools don't work on linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64 andÂ
>
Package: src:linux
Version: linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64
Severity: serious
Hi, I found bpfcc-tools don't work on linux-image-4.8.0-2-amd64 and
linux-image-4.8.0-2-rt-amd64, for these kernels are signed kernel, I think
bpfcc-tools don't work on all signed kernels on x86_64 platform. bpfcc-tools
7 matches
Mail list logo