On Sat, 04 Mar 2017 at 21:13:41 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > Thanks for uploading openjdk-8 without these obsolete dependencies. Please > do the same in the next openjdk-9 upload - I've checked the relevant code > and it seems to be essentially the same, so my justification from > openjdk-8 should be equally valid. > > This is low priority right now since openjdk-9 won't be in stretch anyway.
Oops, I meant to send this to the cloned bug, not the original.
S
