Bug#851261: compiles but doesn't work, not our fault

2017-02-03 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 11:03:49AM +, Radovan Birdic wrote: > > Do any non-ancient machines run 32-bit kernels on MIPS these days? As far > > as I know, they don't, thus fixing this FTBFS is rather pointless without > > fixing COMPAT ioctls on the kernel side first. > > Yes, there are 32-bit

Bug#851261: compiles but doesn't work, not our fault

2017-02-03 Thread Radovan Birdic
> Do any non-ancient machines run 32-bit kernels on MIPS these days? As far > as I know, they don't, thus fixing this FTBFS is rather pointless without > fixing COMPAT ioctls on the kernel side first. Yes, there are 32-bit MIPS machines. We tested duperemove on CI20 (mipsel with 32-bit kernel)

Bug#851261: compiles but doesn't work, not our fault

2017-01-26 Thread Adam Borowski
On 01/13/2017 01:23 PM, Radovan Birdic wrote: > Package: duperemove > Version: 0.11~beta4-1 > Tags: sid + patch > Justification: FTBFS > User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: mips-patch > With these patches, package builds successfully on mips, mipsel, mips64el and > i386. Alas, while