Bug#851650: How does moving XSL stuff fix misbuild PAM manpages

2021-02-04 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Adam" == Adam Borowski writes: Adam> Well, the problem I was fixing was patches not being applied Adam> -- which obviously broke installability. I understand now and regret my previous frustration. Thanks for working with me. So, it seems like we have a couple directions we

Bug#851650: How does moving XSL stuff fix misbuild PAM manpages

2021-02-04 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 05:28:41PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Adam" == Adam Borowski writes: > > Adam> I think we should _always_ trigger a rebuild, to make sure the > Adam> source we provide is the real source. > > I'm really incredibly frustrated reading the above. > I doubt

Bug#851650: How does moving XSL stuff fix misbuild PAM manpages

2021-02-04 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Adam" == Adam Borowski writes: Adam> I think we should _always_ trigger a rebuild, to make sure the Adam> source we provide is the real source. I'm really incredibly frustrated reading the above. I doubt that was your intent, but here's what happened from my standpoint. I asked

Bug#851650: How does moving XSL stuff fix misbuild PAM manpages

2021-02-04 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:20:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > In your NMU of pam 1.1.8-3.4, you moved the xsl build dependencies from > build-depends-indep to build-depends. > > This effectively enables rebuilding of man pages even for binary package > builds. Yes, as they are included in

Bug#851650: How does moving XSL stuff fix misbuild PAM manpages

2021-02-03 Thread Sam Hartman
In your NMU of pam 1.1.8-3.4, you moved the xsl build dependencies from build-depends-indep to build-depends. This effectively enables rebuilding of man pages even for binary package builds. It looks like the goal was to work around problems in multi-arch installability. But I don't see how it