Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Hi Adrey, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:16:16PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > > I'm member of the team (as guest: > > https://alioth.debian.org/users/airween-guest/). As I wrote, I > > noticed the team through the list - no

Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > I'm member of the team (as guest: > https://alioth.debian.org/users/airween-guest/). As I wrote, I > noticed the team through the list - no response. In that case this upload should be a team upload and not a NMU. See

Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Hi Adrey, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:35:50PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:29:43PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > > > Why are doing this NMU? > > because lintian indicated that I must give NMU as version to that > > package > I've meant why are you doing this upload

Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:29:43PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > > Why are doing this NMU? > because lintian indicated that I must give NMU as version to that > package I've meant why are you doing this upload of someone else's package. > Okay, thanks for your feedback - what should I do now? As

Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Hi, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:15:53PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Why are doing this NMU? because lintian indicated that I must give NMU as version to that package > Does it fix any bugs? yes, till I worked on the package, I've found a bug (a binary

Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Why are doing this NMU? Does it fix any bugs? Have you read about the NMU procedure at https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu and followed it? Besides, it even has a wrong version suffix. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP

Bug#851762: RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]

2017-01-18 Thread Ervin Hegedüs
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hamlib" * Package name : hamlib Version : 3.1.0-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : Kamal Mostafa , Colin Tuckley