Hi Adrey,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:16:16PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > I'm member of the team (as guest:
> > https://alioth.debian.org/users/airween-guest/). As I wrote, I
> > noticed the team through the list - no
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> I'm member of the team (as guest:
> https://alioth.debian.org/users/airween-guest/). As I wrote, I
> noticed the team through the list - no response.
In that case this upload should be a team upload and not a NMU. See
Hi Adrey,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:35:50PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:29:43PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > > Why are doing this NMU?
> > because lintian indicated that I must give NMU as version to that
> > package
> I've meant why are you doing this upload
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:29:43PM +0100, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
> > Why are doing this NMU?
> because lintian indicated that I must give NMU as version to that
> package
I've meant why are you doing this upload of someone else's package.
> Okay, thanks for your feedback - what should I do now?
As
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:15:53PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Why are doing this NMU?
because lintian indicated that I must give NMU as version to that
package
> Does it fix any bugs?
yes, till I worked on the package, I've found a bug (a binary
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Why are doing this NMU? Does it fix any bugs? Have you read about the NMU
procedure at
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu
and followed it?
Besides, it even has a wrong version suffix.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hamlib"
* Package name : hamlib
Version : 3.1.0-1+nmu1
Upstream Author : Kamal Mostafa , Colin Tuckley
7 matches
Mail list logo