Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-25 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Gergely, thanks for your message. On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:45:25 +0100 Gergely Risko wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Sorry, don't have the time to followup on the whole discussion again. > > As many times I told Shlomi Fish, I'm happy to help with this package, > but yes, I have a

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Shlomi, you need to make the package build against sid in less than one day.:q vi I did the changes and I'm attaching them here, lots of conflicts between fcs_enums.h and patsolve-shlomif/patsolve/fcs_enums.h fcs_dllexport.h and patsolve-shlomif/patsolve/fcs_dllexport.h (I'm removing

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:12:01PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Andrey, do you agree with me? you started the review, I don't want to steal > your package > or break rules too much :) I didn't look into the packaging, only into the diff between versions, feel free to continue reviewing

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello >This makes me angry and disappointed. I reported >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841445 many months ago and >posted "ping replies" and nothing was done to resolve it - either by the >maintainer, who was missing-in-action and not for the first time - or by a >different

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:56:37 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Oh, and as this NMU doesn't deserve a short delay, it will miss stretch > and so should be uploaded to experimental until the freeze is over, unless > I'm miscalculating. > This makes me angry and disappointed. I

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
Control: retitle -1 RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-0.1 NMU On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 19:52:06 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > should I send a new NMU request based on that or can this ticket be reused > > for it as well?

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:44:03PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > should I send a new NMU request based on that or can this ticket be reused for > it as well? You can reuse this RFS ticket for the package you just uploaded, you should retitle it though. And you still need to follow the NMU

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Oh, and as this NMU doesn't deserve a short delay, it will miss stretch and so should be uploaded to experimental until the freeze is over, unless I'm miscalculating. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
Hi Andrey, On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:25:11 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > Please read and follow > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu > > Your debian/patches/debian-changes is full of conflict markers, this

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Please read and follow https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu Your debian/patches/debian-changes is full of conflict markers, this is unacceptable and also means you did something wrong. B-D changes are not reflected in d/changelog.

Bug#852295: RFS: freecell-solver/4.8.0-1 NMU

2017-01-23 Thread Shlomi Fish
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freecell-solver" * Package name: freecell-solver Version : 4.8.0-1 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL :