Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-04-10 Thread Robbie Harwood
Niels Thykier writes: > Ok - as I understand it, what we are dealing with here is: > > * systemd: You can get gssproxy + NFS and it "just works(tm)" if >you install gssproxy. Otherwise you get svcgssd + NFS. >(This is how I understood Neil Brown) > * sysvinit:

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-04-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Robbie Harwood: > Niels Thykier writes: > >> NeilBrown: >>> On Sun, Mar 05 2017, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> >>> The systemd unit files are designed so that svcgssd will only be >>> started if gssproxy didn't start - and gssproxy is tried first. >>> >>> If you use something other

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-04-05 Thread Robbie Harwood
Niels Thykier writes: > NeilBrown: >> On Sun, Mar 05 2017, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> The systemd unit files are designed so that svcgssd will only be >> started if gssproxy didn't start - and gssproxy is tried first. >> >> If you use something other than systemd, similar

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-04-05 Thread Niels Thykier
NeilBrown: > On Sun, Mar 05 2017, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> [...] > > Yes, they can. > The systemd unit files are designed so that svcgssd will only be started > if gssproxy didn't start - and gssproxy is tried first. > > If you use something other than systemd, similar logic would be needed. >

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-03-19 Thread NeilBrown
On Sun, Mar 05 2017, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 05/03/17 19:42, Niels Thykier wrote: >> On Sat, 04 Feb 2017 09:58:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: >>> Daniel Pocock: [...] Upstream is not really supporting rpc.svcgssd any more, they actually disabled it in the

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-03-05 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 05/03/17 19:42, Niels Thykier wrote: > On Sat, 04 Feb 2017 09:58:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: >> Daniel Pocock: >>> [...] >>> >>> Upstream is not really supporting rpc.svcgssd any more, they actually >>> disabled it in the build so people can still have it as a

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-03-05 Thread Niels Thykier
On Sat, 04 Feb 2017 09:58:00 + Niels Thykier wrote: > Daniel Pocock: > > [...] > > > > Upstream is not really supporting rpc.svcgssd any more, they actually > > disabled it in the build so people can still have it as a transitional > > measure in stretch. > > > > People

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-02-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Daniel Pocock: > On 04/02/17 10:50, Niels Thykier wrote: >> [...] >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for bringing this up. >> >> Is this migration from rpc.svcgssd to gssproxy so important (release >> critical) that it ought to be granted an exception? And if so, why is it >> that important (despite #848306 not

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-02-04 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 04/02/17 10:50, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > CC'ing the maintainer of nfs-common and the reporter of #848306. > > Robbie Harwood: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Please unblock

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-02-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 moreinfo CC'ing the maintainer of nfs-common and the reporter of #848306. Robbie Harwood: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package gssproxy > > gssproxy has been 10 days in

Bug#852395: unblock: gssproxy/0.5.1-2

2017-01-23 Thread Robbie Harwood
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gssproxy gssproxy has been 10 days in unstable, and allowing it to migrate will fix bug#848306 (severity: important) in nfs-common. gssproxy is a new package in