Bug#852521: [tex-live] unicode-math now unable to process $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$

Sorry for the late reply, I'm trying to work out an actual MWE. I did have the initial MWE work, but it appears I have changed something else after filing the initial report. What's weird is the initial MWE does not work, but the two different documents with different settings which break with

Bug#852521: [tex-live] unicode-math now unable to process $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$

Hi James, > I've attached the tex file and output, including stdout and stderr Hmm, is that from a working version? It doesn't look like. Furthermore, it seems that something is going completely different on your side, because loads of different files are loaded. One reason might be your

Bug#852521: [tex-live] unicode-math now unable to process $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$

Hi Norbert I've attached the tex file and output, including stdout and stderr James On 26 January 2017 at 14:28, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, James Tocknell wrote: > > $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$). I've temporary reverted back to > 2016.20161130-1, > > as

Bug#852521: [tex-live] unicode-math now unable to process $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$

On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, James Tocknell wrote: > $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$). I've temporary reverted back to 2016.20161130-1, > as that version works. So this is a regression. Is there an easy way of Can you please: * add \listfiles as first line (before \documentclass...) * run

Bug#852521: [tex-live] unicode-math now unable to process $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$

Hi Norbert Yes, I can confirm this has worked before, on the 10th on January this year (that's the latest version of a document which has $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$). I've temporary reverted back to 2016.20161130-1, as that version works. So this is a regression. Is there an easy way of bisecting

Bug#852521: [tex-live] unicode-math now unable to process $\widetilde{\mathbf{a}}$

Dear James, I guess you haven't seen the answer on the TeX Live mailing list, so I add it here. It seems that this has been the case before, too, and is well known: *** answer from Ulrike Fischer * The problem is that \mathbf doesn't use a font with math table and accent commands don't