Am 24.09.23 um 22:01 schrieb Ricardo Mones:
Mmm... Does it work? Last time I tried that fork it wasn't working very
well (compared to current version in Debian, that is).
Yes, it works well for me.
Hi Bastian,
Wasn't aware you were interested in xsensors, glad to know!
On Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:49:56 +0200
Bastian Germann wrote:
> I am uploading a LowNMU to DELAYED/10 to fix this.
> The GitHub generated tarball is used because autoreconf is run anyway.
> The debdiff is attached.
Mmm...
Hi Jeremy,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:20:37PM -0500, Jeremy Newton wrote:
> Package: xsensors
> Version: 0.70
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I forked xsensors a while ago due to upstream no longer being active.
>
> Please consider changing the xsensors debian package to my fork, as it has
> some bug
Hi Jeremy,
I am no longer actively maintaining Xsensors and just sent a request
to orphan the package in bug #839654. I'm not familiar with the
process of replacing a package with a fork. Perhaps the next
maintainer can look into this.
Regards,
Nanley
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Jeremy
Package: xsensors
Version: 0.70
Severity: wishlist
I forked xsensors a while ago due to upstream no longer being active.
Please consider changing the xsensors debian package to my fork, as it has
some bug fixes and new features, including GTK3 support, preferences and
appdata:
5 matches
Mail list logo
