Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 23:01:46 +0100 Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Just wanted to let know that during the preparations of upgrading the
> package to Xen 4.10 I have been able to build successfully targeting
> unstable so far.
Any progress there? Can you give a status update?
Cheers,
Emilio
On 11/01/2018 22:42, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 11/01/2018 18:59, peter green wrote:
>>> I think the compiler is simply wrong to complain about this.
>> If you are going to build with options like "-Wall -Werror" then you
>> have to expect the compiler to be bitchy. You should be abl
Hey,
On 11/01/2018 18:59, peter green wrote:
>> I think the compiler is simply wrong to complain about this.
> If you are going to build with options like "-Wall -Werror" then you
> have to expect the compiler to be bitchy. You should be able to make
> this particular warning non-fatal by adding -
I think the compiler is simply wrong to complain about this.
If you are going to build with options like "-Wall -Werror" then you have to
expect the compiler to be bitchy. You should be able to make this particular warning
non-fatal by adding -Wno-error=int-in-bool-context
>>> On 31.01.17 at 13:09, wrote:
> Matthias Klose of the Debian Project reports that the Xen package in
> Debian stretch, which is based on a snapshot of xen.git#stable-4.8,
> does not build with GCC-7.
>
> Matthias Klose writes ("Bug#853710: xen: ftbfs with GCC
Matthias Klose of the Debian Project reports that the Xen package in
Debian stretch, which is based on a snapshot of xen.git#stable-4.8,
does not build with GCC-7.
Matthias Klose writes ("Bug#853710: xen: ftbfs with GCC-7"):
> The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at lea
6 matches
Mail list logo
