Bug#854094: [Swan-dev] Bug#854094: libreswan FTBFS on x32 due to missing

On 4 February 2017 at 17:17, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Daniel Schepler wrote: > >> I'm not sure exactly where ARCH comes from - but one difference you >> could use is that the GNU triplet for x32 is x86_64-linux-gnux32, as >> opposed to x86_64-linux-gnu for amd64.

Bug#854094: [Swan-dev] Bug#854094: libreswan FTBFS on x32 due to missing

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Daniel Schepler wrote: I'm not sure exactly where ARCH comes from - but one difference you could use is that the GNU triplet for x32 is x86_64-linux-gnux32, as opposed to x86_64-linux-gnu for amd64. GCCM to -m32 in debian/rules when building for x32? The flag would be

Bug#854094: libreswan FTBFS on x32 due to missing

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hm, i don't think we want it to build for amd64 if we're doing native > builds on x32, right? > > In mk/userland-cflags.mk, we have: > > ifeq ($(origin GCCM),undefined) > ifeq ($(ARCH),i686) > GCCM=-m32 > endif >

Bug#854094: libreswan FTBFS on x32 due to missing

over in https://bugs.debian.org/854094: On Fri 2017-02-03 19:10:43 -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor > wrote: >> Package: libreswan >> Version: 3.19-2 >> X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@buildd.debian.org, swan-...@lists.libreswan.org >>

Bug#854094: libreswan FTBFS on x32 due to missing

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: libreswan > Version: 3.19-2 > X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@buildd.debian.org, swan-...@lists.libreswan.org > > Hi Debian x32 builders-- > > I note that libreswan is failing to build from source on the x32 >

Bug#854094: libreswan FTBFS on x32 due to missing

Package: libreswan Version: 3.19-2 X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@buildd.debian.org, swan-...@lists.libreswan.org Hi Debian x32 builders-- I note that libreswan is failing to build from source on the x32 platform due to a missing sys/time.h: