On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:21:41 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 24.02.2017 00:16, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > Source: qemu
> > Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2
> > Severity: low
> >
> > Could you please use the full version number 2.8.0 instead of 2.8?
>
> What's wrong with using just 2-component version number?
>
24.02.2017 00:16, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Source: qemu
> Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2
> Severity: low
>
> Could you please use the full version number 2.8.0 instead of 2.8?
What's wrong with using just 2-component version number?
We do apply the stable patchsets, and we do apply the selected
stable
Source: qemu
Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-2
Severity: low
Could you please use the full version number 2.8.0 instead of 2.8?
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qemu complains that a newer upstream
version is available because that's what the watch file indicates.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
3 matches
Mail list logo