Bug#856128:

Hi, The upstream author of CUPS-PDF recently agreed to publish package signatures for future releases. While I share the sentiment of the reporting party, the specific point regarding CUPS-PDF may be moot. Thank you! Kind regards, Felix Lechner

Bug#856128: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature: false positives

Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Yes, if upstream does not publish gpg signatures, you are stuck with > that tag. You may override it if you wish so (I personally wouldn't), > but the idea is that you should talk with upstream and "convince" him to > start doing so. Martin-Éric, does this resolve your

Bug#856128: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature: false positives

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 01:13:47PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > No, it does not. Adding a pgpurlmangle option won't magically make > upstream produce GPG signatures. Oh, sorry, I misread your first email, reading that your upstream does provide signatures, and even with that lintian was

Bug#856128: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature: false positives

2017-02-26 12:07 GMT+02:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 01:04:54PM +, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> It appears that debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature generates false >> positives. >> >> On src:cups-pdf Lintian reports

Bug#856128: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature: false positives

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 01:04:54PM +, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > It appears that debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature generates false > positives. > > On src:cups-pdf Lintian reports debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature > yet upstream does not publish any GPG

Bug#856128: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature: false positives

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.50.1 Severity: normal It appears that debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature generates false positives. On src:cups-pdf Lintian reports debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature yet upstream does not publish any GPG signature. However, upstream does publish