control: tag -1 -wontfix
On 04/10/2017 05:39 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:58:52AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Markus: would you please take this RFS to its end?
I'm rather busy with stretch issues I'd like to fix (and then there's
the day job as well...)
I take it
control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:58:52AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Since Markus has got involved in this thread, perhaps you can organise a
> team upload, and/or add Boyuan to the Uploaders: field.
Indeed.
Markus: would you please take this RFS to its end?
> > * This
control: tag -1 +wontfix
Dear Boyuan,
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:53:47PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> fgrun (2016.4.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* New upstream release. (Closes: #839357)
> - Drop patches applied upstream.
> - Refresh patches.
On 03/08/2017 02:29 PM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> I understand that tarballs are important and could greatly reduce extra works.
Well, it's relatively trivial to assemble a tarball. So I think of it
more as a sign of upstream's quality awareness (or lack thereof). But
well...
> Fgrun is really
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org
在 2017年3月8日星期三 SGT 下午1:06:02，Markus Wanner 写道：
> I kind of allow developers to out-source that task (i.e. to github) and
> only provide tags. Unfortunately, I didn't find a similar solution with
> Sourceforge, yet. (It seems it's all there, but
Hello Boyuan,
thanks for your efforts.
On 03/08/2017 11:53 AM, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> * For new d/watch file: I had a hard time making decisions and finally chose
> the
> sf.net redirector provided by qa.d.o, which points to flightgear *main*
> project
> tarballs.
The lack of an upstream
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-fgfs-c...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors and pkg-fgfs-crew maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "fgrun" into Unstable, perhaps into
DELAYED/7 or DELAYED/10.
* Package name: fgrun
Version
7 matches
Mail list logo
