Bug#857147: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#857147: darktable builds with -msse2 on i386

based on the discussion in this bug, and https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/views/view.c#L328-L332 I'm currently leaning towards dropping i386 binaries for stretch.

Bug#857147: darktable builds with -msse2 on i386

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:25:18PM +0300, Roman Lebedev wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> > Source: darktable >> > Version: 2.2.1-2 >> > Severity: serious >> > >> >

Bug#857147: darktable builds with -msse2 on i386

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:25:18PM +0300, Roman Lebedev wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Source: darktable > > Version: 2.2.1-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable=i386=2.2.1-2=1483383078=0 > > > >

Bug#857147: darktable builds with -msse2 on i386

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: darktable > Version: 2.2.1-2 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable=i386=2.2.1-2=1483383078=0 > > ... > -- Performing Test _MSSE2 > -- Performing Test _MSSE2 - Success > --

Bug#857147: [Pkg-phototools-devel] Bug#857147: darktable builds with -msse2 on i386

Adrian Bunk writes: > > These are not SSE2 codepaths with autodetection, > the package seems to be built in a way that it > won't run on hardware without SSE2. Did you test the resulting binary? When I tested it (several years ago), the resulting binary detected lack of sse2

Bug#857147: darktable builds with -msse2 on i386

Source: darktable Version: 2.2.1-2 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable=i386=2.2.1-2=1483383078=0 ... -- Performing Test _MSSE2 -- Performing Test _MSSE2 - Success -- Building SSE2-optimized codepaths: ON ... [ 4%] Building C object