Bug#857569: closed by Eduard Bloch <e...@gmx.de> (Re: Bug#857569: apt-cacher-ng: Upgrading failed on jessie using backports)

Hallo, * Charles Curley [Tue, Mar 14 2017, 04:07:41PM]: > I understand I need the -t option to install from backports *for the > first time*. But I had no reason to believe that I was installing > anything from backports for the first time. Thanks to the error message > I got from dpkg, I figured

Bug#857569: closed by Eduard Bloch <e...@gmx.de> (Re: Bug#857569: apt-cacher-ng: Upgrading failed on jessie using backports)

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:25:42 +0100 Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > > It is not a good idea to draw conclusions where you have no data. > > I don't, you have sent all data. The way you run the commands is > wrong, you need to use the -t option. OK, here is what I didn't tell you.

Bug#857569: closed by Eduard Bloch <e...@gmx.de> (Re: Bug#857569: apt-cacher-ng: Upgrading failed on jessie using backports)

Hallo, * Charles Curley [Tue, Mar 14 2017, 11:08:28AM]: > On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:30:04 + > ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > > > Sorry to tell you that but you seriously failed to RTFM. Please follow > > the instructions at > >

Bug#857569: closed by Eduard Bloch <e...@gmx.de> (Re: Bug#857569: apt-cacher-ng: Upgrading failed on jessie using backports)

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:30:04 + ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > Sorry to tell you that but you seriously failed to RTFM. Please follow > the instructions at > https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ . Why do you draw that conclusion? As a matter of fact, I