Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-31 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2017-03-31T18:39:23-0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > > Hello Branden, > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:40:51PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > I've reuploaded 4.9c-4. > > I can't find this on mentors... As I said, an e-mailed debdiff would > be fine at this point. I

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-31 Thread Sean Whitton
control: owner -1 ! Hello Branden, On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:40:51PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > I've reuploaded 4.9c-4. I can't find this on mentors... As I said, an e-mailed debdiff would be fine at this point. > Please find attached two files which were not dput, which you may

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-31 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Branden, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:13:35PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Yes, it was. Either the build-dep on groff was always too strong or > groff-base got split out at some point in the past decade (or a little > more). > > Would you like me to rebuild? Will I be able to

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-30 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Branden, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:29:25AM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > It can. I've uploaded xtrs 4.9c-4 with a far leaner set of changes, and > am attaching a diff of the diff to this message. As you can see, it's > far leaner. > > Thoughts? Was the Build-Depends change

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-30 Thread G. Branden Robinson
At 2017-03-29T12:59:12-0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Branden, > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:29:38PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:28:25PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > So my goals were, in this order: > > > > 1) Get the package suitable for

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-29 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Branden, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:29:38PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:28:25PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > > So my goals were, in this order: > > > 1) Get the package suitable for unstable (which it wasn't); then > > > 2) Get the package

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-28 Thread G. Branden Robinson
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:16:21PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Branden, > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:28:25PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > > You are very unlikely to get release team approval for this upload as it > > > stands. Given what you wrote in #511645, is your intention

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-28 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Branden, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:28:25PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > You are very unlikely to get release team approval for this upload as it > > stands. Given what you wrote in #511645, is your intention for xtrs to > > drop out of stretch, to be reintroduced in buster? > >

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-28 Thread G. Branden Robinson
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 07:11:10PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: tag -1 +moreinfo > > Dear Branden, > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:45:34PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > * Merge new upstream release. > > + "Deleted all SIGIO code. The

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-27 Thread Sean Whitton
control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Branden, On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:45:34PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote: > Changes since the last upload: > > * Merge new upstream release. > + "Deleted all SIGIO code. The code was a kludge to begin with and it no > longer worked with current X

Bug#858800: RFS: xtrs/4.9d-1 [ITA]

2017-03-26 Thread Branden Robinson
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I seek a sponsor for my package "xtrs". * Package name: xtrs Version : 4.9d-1 Upstream Author : Tim Mann * URL : http://www.tim-mann.org/xtrs.html * License : 2 different custom permissive