Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-14 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:33:36PM -0500, Jerome wrote: > Thank's a lot for your questions and remark. This will help me to detect > where was the problem. > And i apologize that teh error is generated during the creation of a live > debian iso file. As the error wa detected in the live itself, i

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-11 Thread Jerome
Dear Andreas. Thank's a lot for your questions and remark. This will help me to detect where was the problem. And i apologize that teh error is generated during the creation of a live debian iso file. As the error wa detected in the live itself, i send the report as this.. Forgetting that i'm

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jerome, On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:42:40PM -0500, Jerome wrote: > I put here the results of the commands. Home that helps... I think so since it confirms the expected reason for the issue you observed. > $ sudo update-binfmts --display jarwrapper > update-binfmts: warning: jarwrapper not in

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-08 Thread Jerome
Dear Andreas. I put here the results of the commands. Home that helps... $ sudo update-binfmts --display jarwrapper update-binfmts: warning: jarwrapper not in database of installed binary formats. update-binfmts: exiting due to previous errors $ sudo update-binfmts --display jar

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-05-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Tony, On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 08:11:52AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > This does sound like an issue we had in the past with jarwrapper and > binfmt-support. IIRC, Colin Watson was able to track down the source of > this, but at the

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-04-28 Thread tony mancill
Hi Andreas, This does sound like an issue we had in the past with jarwrapper and binfmt-support. IIRC, Colin Watson was able to track down the source of this, but at the moment I cannot locate the details of that exchange. It was something along the lines of there being multiple interpreters

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-04-24 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Java developers, is there any known issue with running JARs via symlink to /usr/bin? I suspect this is the problem with this bug but I wonder what might be the recommended way from Java team about this way to start Java programs that used to work but is not always relieable. Kind regards

Bug#859660: Bug#859660: artemis running issue

2017-04-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:17:08PM +0200, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi, > > > على الأربعاء 5 نيسـان 2017 ‫12:32، كتب Jerome: > >> When running artemis package, get this issue : > >> > >> $ art > >> bash: /usr/bin/art: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error > > Probably something to