At 2017-04-22T16:04:25-0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Can you explain your reasoning here?
>
> Currently, almost all Debian packagers/maintainers use one changelog
> entry and version number per upload. So if there are rounds of review
> in an RFS, new changes are folded into the previous
Hello Branden,
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 03:41:48PM -0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1) How about merging the -1, -2 and -3~~unreleased changelog entries
> > into a single entry, since we're doing a single upload?
>
> Won't that prompt the question of what happened to -1 and -2?
>
> Or do
At 2017-04-22T15:41:48-0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Given this problem I haven't done a full review, but I'd like to make
> > two preliminary suggestions:
> >
> > 1) How about merging the -1, -2 and -3~~unreleased changelog entries
> > into a single entry, since we're doing a single
At 2017-04-22T07:13:38-0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> Hello Branden,
>
> I can't get 79e8ccf40499ace8cf36210a7ad9fb157209bbe4 to build. Log
> attached.
Urp. This is due to the unavailabilty of gropdf on the build host, it
looks like. I'll investigate.
> Given this
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello Branden,
I can't get 79e8ccf40499ace8cf36210a7ad9fb157209bbe4 to build. Log
attached.
Given this problem I haven't done a full review, but I'd like to make
two preliminary suggestions:
1) How about merging the -1, -2 and -3~~unreleased changelog entries
into a
5 matches
Mail list logo
