tags 860656 - patch
thanks
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> The tests don't need fixing, they are pointing out a real issue, check
> the bug report to upstream for more info.
Sorry it looked like it was just a test representation issue. Untagging
"patch"...
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :'
The tests don't need fixing, they are pointing out a real issue, check
the bug report to upstream for more info. If we just want to ship with
this specific issue not fixed, then patching the test could lead people
astray. Instead, seems like we should just disable that test on 32-bit
archs.
tags 860656 + patch
thanks
Patch attached.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
diff --git a/tests/test_write.py b/tests/test_write.py
index 83c6419..fabd2be 100644
--- a/tests/test_write.py
+++
Lucas Nussbaum wrote...
> During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
> sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386.
[ reformatted ]
> > AssertionError:
| '[4294967295L, 4294967294L, 4294967296L, 4294967293L, 4294967297L,
8589934590L, 2147483647L]' !=
|
Source: python-biplist
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
5 matches
Mail list logo