Control: tags -1 stretch-ignore
intrigeri:
> Dominic Hargreaves:
>> Please could you rule on whether the above class of bugs should be RC
>> for stretch? It doesn't seem productive at this late stage.
>
> Indeed: I'll be happy to fix that in Buster or in a Stretch
> point-release (also because
Dominic Hargreaves:
> Please could you rule on whether the above class of bugs should be RC
> for stretch? It doesn't seem productive at this late stage.
Indeed: I'll be happy to fix that in Buster or in a Stretch
point-release (also because I've noticed it breaks autopkgtests for
some packages
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:43:21PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> gregor herrmann wrote:
>
> > > This is due to GNUPGHOME needing to fit within sockaddr_un.sun_path.
> >
> > Also #861591, where the same happens.
> >
> > I'm not sure how RC-ish this should be, as build paths by our usual
> > tools
gregor herrmann wrote:
> > This is due to GNUPGHOME needing to fit within sockaddr_un.sun_path.
>
> Also #861591, where the same happens.
>
> I'm not sure how RC-ish this should be, as build paths by our usual
> tools (sbuild, pbuilder) are, IIRC, shorter (/build//…), so
> this shouldn't be a
On Mon, 08 May 2017 22:25:54 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> retitle 862071 password-store: FTBFS when built in a path with >= 74
> characters
> thanks
>
>
> (Yes, really.)
> This is due to GNUPGHOME needing to fit within sockaddr_un.sun_path.
Also #861591, where the same happens.
I'm not sure
5 matches
Mail list logo
