Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-08-02 Thread Bdale Garbee
tags 862309 +pending thanks Michael Biebl writes: > the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist. Thanks for catching this. I didn't notice when the upstream Makefile changed to deliver this by default. Fixed in my revision control system for the next

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-08-02 Thread Bdale Garbee
Paul Wise writes: > it might be useful to install it as an example instead. Sure, makes sense, and easy to do. Bdale signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-06-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Paul Wise wrote: > Michael Biebl wrote: > > the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist. > > Afaics, this is a sample file provided by upstream and I don't think > > this should go into /etc > > Agreed, but it might be useful to install it as an example instead. > A sudoers

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-05-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 11 May 2017 03:41:46 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist. > Afaics, this is a sample file provided by upstream and I don't think > this should go into /etc Agreed, but it might be useful to install it as an example instead. A sudoers

Bug#862309: Don't install /etc/sudoers.dist sample file

2017-05-10 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: sudo Version: 1.8.20-1 Severity: normal Hi, the latest update installed a new conffile /etc/sudoers.dist. Afaics, this is a sample file provided by upstream and I don't think this should go into /etc, /etc/sudoers and our conffile mechanism is sufficient. -- System Information: Debian