Bug#862873: RFA: vblade-persist

2018-09-01 Thread Christoph Biedl
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote... > It'd take a bit of thinking about how to handle mac address > limitations, and the decision about whether to place the symlink or > not, to bring this up to parity with the current implementation, but > then this work could be donated directly to the vblade

Bug#862873: RFA: vblade-persist

2018-06-26 Thread Aurelio Juarez
On Wed, 17 May 2017 18:28:16 -0400 Daniel Kahn Gillmor < d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I'm both upstream and the debian maintainer for vblade-persist. I > don't currently use it, and i don't have much time for it. > Furthermore, it relies on runit because i

Bug#862873: RFA: vblade-persist

2018-01-02 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: retitle 862873 O: vblade-persist Control: affects 862873 + vblade-persist On Wed 2017-05-17 19:28:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > If someone wants to adopt vblade-persist, that would be fine with me. > If someone wants to take the systemd approach i describe above, i'd be > happy

Bug#862873: RFA: vblade-persist

2017-05-17 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I'm both upstream and the debian maintainer for vblade-persist. I don't currently use it, and i don't have much time for it. Furthermore, it relies on runit because i didn't trust sysvinit. with the advent of systemd, i think that vblade-persist would be better