On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 at 21:13:58 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Would you mind if I took those aspects of your mail to debian-devel ?
Nothing in this thread is private, and I believe all of it is already
cc'd to the public bug report #864028.
I suspect that contradicting how we have always asked
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
against security?"):
> The source code for gtk-doc.make is itself.
Ah. OK. That's fine then for the stable update.
I think therefore that this should be approved. I hope RMs have time
to formally approve it although
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 at 10:24:36 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
> against security?"):
> > gtk-doc.make is copied in from gtk-doc-tools by gtkdocize during the
> > upstream autogen.sh run. It isn't currently replaced by
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
against security?"):
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 22:13:14 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > * document-portal/xdp-dbus.c was generated by a version of
> >gdbus-codegen which seems to be only in Debian experimental. !
>
>
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 22:13:14 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
> against security?"):
> > Yes, this update was proposed while stretch was still in freeze,
> > and I didn't want to annoy the release team with more pings if
Simon McVittie writes ("Re: stretch-pu: package flatpak, maybe want debdiff
against security?"):
> Yes, this update was proposed while stretch was still in freeze,
> and I didn't want to annoy the release team with more pings if they
> were deliberately leaving it dormant until after r1. Diff
On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 at 22:18:54 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The biggest thing I tripped over was that the debdiff is against
> current stretch, not against stretch-security. So I found myself
> seeing changes in the diff which had already been made on stretch
> installations, in practice.
Yes,
tl/dr: I started reviewing this request, but didn't finish.
The biggest thing I tripped over was that the debdiff is against
current stretch, not against stretch-security. So I found myself
seeing changes in the diff which had already been made on stretch
installations, in practice.
Is this
8 matches
Mail list logo
