also sprach martin f krafft [2017-06-16 20:26 +0200]:
> I tried card-timeout 5 just now and even after 10 seconds, I can
> sign messages without a PIN just fine… multiple times. So either
> I am doing it wrong or it's doing it wrong ;)
For the record, I've now had card-timeout=5 (in combination w
also sprach Werner Koch [2017-06-15 21:40 +0200]:
> A workaround is to force a reset of the card by putting
>
> card-timeout N
>
> in scdaemon.conf which shuts down the card after N seconds. Well, as of
> now N is just a binary flag to tell sdaemon to shutdown the card at the
> next timer tic
also sprach Daniel Kahn Gillmor [2017-06-16 02:44
+0200]:
> Does it make sense to keep this architectural parallel clean, when it
> makes the user's mental model more complex? or would it make sense to
> try to map the simpler mental model to the underlying architecture, and
> have gpg-agent for
On Thu 2017-06-15 21:40:28 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> The properties of a smartcard and an on-disk key are very different. In
> fact a smartcard should be considered another gpg-agent to which
> gpg-agent delegates its operation.
I understand this idea from the implementation perspective, and be
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:43, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> I believe that killing gpg-agent kills scdaemon, which de-initializes
> the smartcard on shutdown, which takes it out of authenticated mode.
Right the smartcard is power-cycled and thus it clears all its transient
state.
> on whether that
5 matches
Mail list logo
