Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

Ondřej Surý writes: > Wait, after re-reading your first bugreport - did you removed, but not > purged the pdns-backend-bind package? As I reported in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865561#16 Jessie -> Stretch upgrade failed, because pdns_server process failed to start after

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

Wait, after re-reading your first bugreport - did you removed, but not purged the pdns-backend-bind package? O. On 24 June 2017 7:45:12 a.m. Juha Heinanen wrote: Christian Hofstaedtler writes: Previously bindbackend was not optional but always builtin into core. Having a

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

Christian Hofstaedtler writes: > Previously bindbackend was not optional but always builtin into > core. Having a module is a new option in 4.x, and the package is > there to support configurations without bindbackend. > > You can remove the package if you don't want it. I can remove it, but

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

* Juha Heinanen [170623 20:33]: > Ondřej Surý writes: > > I think that Recommends/Suggests should reflect their actual meanings (e.g > > it is recommended to have bind plugin installed under common conditions). > > It should not be changes to workaround settings of apt. > >

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

Ondřej Surý writes: > You can always use apt-get --no-recommends if you don't want the > recommended packages to be installed. I don't know that Debian policy says about distribution upgrades, but in my opinion it is not good practice if upgrade of a perfectly well configured package fails. >

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

That's up to Christian (maintainer) to decide... On 23 June 2017 8:04:44 p.m. James Cloos wrote: "OS" == Ondřej Surý writes: OS> (e.g it is recommended to have bind plugin installed under common OS> conditions). Why is it recommended, though? I

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

> "OS" == Ondřej Surý writes: OS> (e.g it is recommended to have bind plugin installed under common OS> conditions). Why is it recommended, though? I suspect most use pdns for db backends. All of the backends should be suggested, not recommended. -JimC -- James Cloos

Bug#865561: [Pkg-dns-devel] Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

You can always use apt-get --no-recommends if you don't want the recommended packages to be installed. I think that Recommends/Suggests should reflect their actual meanings (e.g it is recommended to have bind plugin installed under common conditions). It should not be changes to workaround

Bug#865561: closed by Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org> (Re: Bug#865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch)

Debian Bug Tracking System writes: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the pdns-server package: > > #865561: pdns_server does not start after upgrade to stretch > > It has been closed by Christian Hofstaedtler . > > Their