Bug#868165: emacs25: FTBFS on arm64

2017-07-22 Thread Rob Browning
Edmund Grimley Evans writes: > It looks like Emacs Lisp may be involved. Does Emacs Lisp use tagged > pointers? Pointers have fairly recently become 48-bit on arm64, which > has broken some other programs. I believe it does, and I believe it (at least used to)

Bug#868165: emacs25: FTBFS on arm64

2017-07-21 Thread Edmund Grimley Evans
The Ubuntu bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs25/+bug/1656474 Memory corruption reported on mailing list: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-03/msg00827.html It looks like Emacs Lisp may be involved. Does Emacs Lisp use tagged pointers? Pointers have fairly

Bug#868165: emacs25: FTBFS on arm64

2017-07-19 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Source: emacs25 Version: 25.2+1-2 Followup-For: Bug #868165 Hi! If the optimization level has influence on the actual build failure, this might be caused by a gcc bug. Did you try building with an older, known-to-work version of gcc? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian

Bug#868165: emacs25: FTBFS on arm64

2017-07-12 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Source: emacs25 Version: 25.2+1-2 Severity: serious Hello, emacs25 seems to be FTBFS on arm64. In Ubuntu we had mostly the same failure in the past months, and we workarounded it by using -O0 on that architecture. Since Debian has porterboxes, a better debugging should be the best solution