Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 11:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 23:08 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > There's a chance that on some signals (including, but not limited to
> > SIGSEGV) socat goes to an infinite loop
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 23:08 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> There's a chance that on some signals (including, but not limited to
> SIGSEGV) socat goes to an infinite loop and consume all CPU cycles.
> Upstream patched it[1] for 1.7.3.2 release, which is in Sid. Basi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi SRMs,
There's a chance that on some signals (including, but not limited to
SIGSEGV) socat goes to an infinite loop and consume all CPU cycles.
Upstream patched it[1] for 1.7.3.2
3 matches
Mail list logo
