On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:15:15 +0530 Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> gitlab 10.7 needs rugged 0.27. Can we have libgit2 0.27 in experimental?
Ximin,
Can you update the patch for 0.27? I have imported the 0.27 version in
git in master-0.27 branch (though it seems gbp updated master branch as
well, even tho
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 17:59:59 +0200 Russell Sim
wrote:
> From what i can see GitLab 9.5 uses 0.26. Is there any reason not to
> target this version instead? I realize this may not suite your original
> plans but it will be less work in the long term.
>
> Theoretically, if we did change the epoch
On 20 August 2017 at 17:10, Abhijith PA wrote:
>
> > The latest version of libgit2 is 0.26 and it has been uploaded to
> > experimental. Is ruby-rugged 0.26 compatible with GitLab?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Russell Sim
>
> No, ruby-rugged need one to one matching with libgit2 version. Curre
> The latest version of libgit2 is 0.26 and it has been uploaded to
> experimental. Is ruby-rugged 0.26 compatible with GitLab?
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Russell Sim
No, ruby-rugged need one to one matching with libgit2 version. Current
upstream version of ruby-rugged is 0.26, but there is a stron
Hey Abhijith,
On 20 August 2017 at 16:24, Abhijith PA wrote:
>
> Can you package libgit2 version 0.25 . It is really needed for the
> ruby-rugged_0.25, which is a dependency of GitLab.
>
The latest version of libgit2 is 0.26 and it has been uploaded to
experimental. Is ruby-rugged 0.26 compati
Hello Russell.
Can you package libgit2 version 0.25 . It is really needed for the
ruby-rugged_0.25, which is a dependency of GitLab.
Thank you
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
6 matches
Mail list logo