Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-10-06 Thread astian
Michael Tokarev: > This bug has been fixed by the last security update of qemu. > > Thanks, > > /mjt Shall we close it then? The "Closes:" in the changelog somehow did not do it...

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-10-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
05.10.2017 06:53, Kuba Dexter wrote: > This bug can be can be 'disarmed' by using below settings (or I shuld say > comment this settings): This bug has been fixed by the last security update of qemu. Thanks, /mjt

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-10-04 Thread Kuba Dexter
This bug can be can be 'disarmed' by using below settings (or I shuld say comment this settings): #apic = 1 #sdl = 0 #usbdevice = 'tablet' I think that the main problem is param 'usbdevice=' . I watched two machines with commented above options - problem solved... Please check it.

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-09-28 Thread astian
Michael Tokarev: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:11:00 + astian wrote: >> [snip] > > Now that's interesting. > > The thing is that I've never seen this email. Now I come across it while > trying > to understand what's going on here. Hmm, I sent that message with an attached

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-09-24 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:11:00 + astian wrote: > Control: found -1 1:2.8+dfsg-7 > Control: tags -1 + patch fixed-upstream > > Hi, > > After staring at GDB for ungodly spans of time I managed to track down this > bug, ipso facto discovering that it was already fixed upstream

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-08-31 Thread astian
Control: found -1 1:2.8+dfsg-7 Control: tags -1 + patch fixed-upstream Hi, After staring at GDB for ungodly spans of time I managed to track down this bug, ipso facto discovering that it was already fixed upstream quite some time ago... I think you took upstream commit

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-08-23 Thread Thierry JAOUEN (ILIAD)
Hello, Again, this new bug seems related: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871702 Same issues, same workarround. See ya Le 17/08/2017 à 11:59, Thierry JAOUEN a écrit : Hello, This bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872257 seems related. Same issues,

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-08-17 Thread Thierry JAOUEN
Hello, This bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872257 seems related. Same issues, same workarround. I have the same kind of configuration with this in /etc/default/grub: *** GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER="true" GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN="" GRUB_CMDLINE_XEN_DEFAULT="dom0_mem=4096M

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-08-10 Thread Thierry JAOUEN
Le 10/08/2017 à 14:36, Michael Tokarev a écrit : Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible 10.08.2017 15:16, Thierry JAOUEN wrote: Package: qemu-system-x86 Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-08-10 Thread Michael Tokarev
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible 10.08.2017 15:16, Thierry JAOUEN wrote: > Package: qemu-system-x86 > Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u2 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** > >* What led up to the

Bug#871648: qemu-system-x86: /usr/bin/qemu-system-i386 eats slowly but surely all the Dom0 memory

2017-08-10 Thread Thierry JAOUEN
Package: qemu-system-x86 Version: 1:2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Upgrade to last stable version. And restart VM. * What exactly did you do (or not do)