Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:52:03AM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > >> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches > >> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are > >> updated accordingly. > >> With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-13 Thread Christian Göttsche
2017-10-06 15:00 GMT+02:00 Sven Hoexter : > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: >> I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches >> are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are >> updated accordingly.

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-06 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches > are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are > updated accordingly. > With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-10-06 Thread Christian Göttsche
I uploaded a new package version in which the not upstreamed patches are dropped, the maintainer is set to myself and the vcs fields are updated accordingly. With #874387 Felix is searching for a new maintainer for this package; what are the requirements for me to become such? Also, I like to ask

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-09-10 Thread Christian Göttsche
> You didn't even mention that bug in the changelog. What is its number? 872709 : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872709 >> and send him an email with no response. > How long ago? 30. August >> ITA seems to be the best fit. > Best fit for what? For a package update >> In

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-09-05 Thread Felix Geyer
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 00:45:00 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > > >> * Non-maintainer upload > > > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA? > > > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read > > >

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-09-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:32:55PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: > >> * Non-maintainer upload > > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA? > > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu > > for valid NMU

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-09-05 Thread Christian Göttsche
>>Version : 1.17-1+nmu1 > The version suffix is wrong. Fixed >> * Non-maintainer upload > If it's a NMU why does the RFS subject say ITA? > And why are you doing this NMU? Please read > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#nmu > for valid NMU reasons

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-09-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:37:00PM +0200, Christian Göttsche wrote: >Version : 1.17-1+nmu1 The version suffix is wrong. > Changes since the last upload: > > vnstat (1.17-1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * Non-maintainer upload If it's a NMU why

Bug#874373: RFS: vnstat/1.17-1+nmu1 ITA

2017-09-05 Thread Christian Göttsche
Package: sponsorship-requests X-Debbugs-CC: fge...@debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vnstat" * Package name: vnstat Version : 1.17-1+nmu1 Upstream Author : Teemu Toivola * URL : http://humdi.net/vnstat/ * License :