On 2017-09-14 09:29, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> I am afraid the fix in 0.16.8-4 is not complete.
>
> Now gajim sets GPG_BINARY to '/usr/bin/gpg2', but this binary is only
> provided by the "gnupg2" package which is a transitional package and it
> may not be always installed.
Antonio, you are right: T
On 2017-09-14 at 09:29:48 +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> A workaround is to install the gnupg2 package (if this is your preferred
> solution then gajim should depend on the gnupg2 package), but I am not
> sure this is the right solution, maybe setting GPG_BINARY = 'gpg' is
> better? The original re
Package: gajim
Version: 0.16.8-4
Followup-For: Bug #874791
Dear Maintainer,
I am afraid the fix in 0.16.8-4 is not complete.
Now gajim sets GPG_BINARY to '/usr/bin/gpg2', but this binary is only
provided by the "gnupg2" package which is a transitional package and it
may not be always installed.
Hi Enrico,
thanks for your bug report!
On 2017-09-09 17:56, Enrico Rossi wrote:
> updating to python-gnupg 0.4.1-1 which let gajim run with only gpg2
> installed, it crash because it tries to lunch gpg1 binary hardcoded into
> the gajim.py (see /usr/share/gajim/src/common/gajim.py line 162).
I e
Package: gajim
Version: 0.16.8-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
updating to python-gnupg 0.4.1-1 which let gajim run with only gpg2
installed, it crash because it tries to lunch gpg1 binary hardcoded into
the gajim.py (see /usr/share/gajim/src/common/gajim.py line 162).
1st workaround: cre
5 matches
Mail list logo