Bug#874812: [amora-server] Qt4 removal from Debian

2020-02-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Adenilson Cavalcanti wrote: > Long story short, I support removing it from Debian as I lack the time to > do the re-write and the devices that could run the client are long gone. Thanks for your comment — and the nice flashback. :-) I've just requested removal of amora-server from Debian

Bug#874812: [amora-server] Qt4 removal from Debian

2020-02-29 Thread Adenilson Cavalcanti
Gentlemen Thanks for adding me in the thread, I really appreciate it. I wrote Amora server/client way back in 2007 (13 years ago) and for a little while it was a pretty successful project. We had a PyS60 (Nokia S60), J2ME client (never released) and a PythonEFL (Nokia tablets) client. Around

Bug#874812: [amora-server] Qt4 removal from Debian

2020-02-29 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Moritz, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Sounds good, removing it entirely is fair enough. Are you filing an RM > bug? Otherwise I can do it as well. Will do, but want to wait at least a few days to allow upstream to comment. Otherwise I'd probably already done it. Regards, Axel --

Bug#874812: [amora-server] Qt4 removal from Debian

2020-02-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 01:47:20AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > Attached is a quick-and-dirty patch to drop the amora-applet binary > > package, qt4 will soon be removed from unstable. > > Thanks for the effort, but in the meanwhile I'm rather think we

Bug#874812: [amora-server] Qt4 removal from Debian

2020-02-28 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Moritz, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Attached is a quick-and-dirty patch to drop the amora-applet binary > package, qt4 will soon be removed from unstable. Thanks for the effort, but in the meanwhile I'm rather think we should remove amora completely from Debian, at least for now. Upstream