Bug#877670: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#877670: Bug#877670: bcftools FTBFS on armel armhf and ppc64el

Control: reassign -1 htslib 1.4-1 Control: tags -1 + patch Control: affects -1 bcftools It seems this code appeared in htslib 1.4, but was only tested in bcftools 1.5. Description: Fix calculation of PLs on ARM and POWER Bug: https://github.com/samtools/bcftools/issues/702 Bug-Debian:

Bug#877670: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#877670: Bug#877670: bcftools FTBFS on armel armhf and ppc64el

FWIW, I tried building htslib 1.6 and bcftools 1.6, but the issue is still present. I also tried building htslib 1.5 and becftools 1.5 with -fsigned-char but that didn't help either. Looking closer at test/test.pl, I noticed the failing test is new, so this is not a regression. Simply dropping

Bug#877670: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#877670: bcftools FTBFS on armel armhf and ppc64el

On 14 October 2017 at 03:12, peter green wrote: > Here is the diff I got on my armhf system. > > --- test/mpileup/indel-AD.1.out 2017-06-20 11:49:44.0 + > +++ test/mpileup/indel-AD.1.out.new 2017-10-14 01:06:23.687285852 + > @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ > 00F

Bug#877670: bcftools FTBFS on armel armhf and ppc64el

On 14/10/17 01:16, peter green wrote: I'm going to see if I can reproduce this bug locally and find out what the output difference is. Here is the diff I got on my armhf system. --- test/mpileup/indel-AD.1.out 2017-06-20 11:49:44.0 + +++ test/mpileup/indel-AD.1.out.new

Bug#877670: bcftools FTBFS on armel armhf and ppc64el

retitle 877670 bcftools FTBFS on armel, armhf and ppc64el found 877670 1.5-2 thanks The good news is that bcftools 1.5-2 successfully built on mipsel. The bad news is that still leaves three architectures where this package has build regressions. ppc64el, armel and armhf. All three now seem to