Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2019-04-30 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Version: 20190415.1030-0+deb9u1 On Thu 2017-10-19 02:06:27 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Or is this bug report just asking for a new upload of publicsuffix to > stretch-updates to catch the few dozen domains that have been updated > since stretch was released? publicsuffix for stretch is

Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2017-10-22 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2017-10-20 13:25:54 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > I don't really need daily updates, just automated ones. I use the > list for looking up DMARC policies, much like opendmarc. A missing > update may result in overlooking a domain's policy record. In that > case requested reports will

Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2017-10-20 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Thu 19/Oct/2017 21:10:58 +0200 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2017-10-19 13:04:13 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> >> What do you reckon? > > I'm not particularly interested in setting up cronjobs for people that > (a) introduce new regular network activity and (b) have dubious >

Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2017-10-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Thu 2017-10-19 13:04:13 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > No, it's much faster. They say once every few days, but there are > longer periods of quiescence, irregularly distributed along time. For > details see: > https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/commits/master I'm aware of the frequency,

Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2017-10-19 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Thu 19/Oct/2017 08:06:27 +0200 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > The publicsuffix package itself is what most debian packages should rely > on -- It will be updated regularly, and you'll have not only a recent > psl but you won't have to fetch any other data besides package upgrades. > > This is

Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2017-10-19 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2017-10-18 13:18:00 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > at publicsuffix.org they recommend to avoid downloading the list too often, > and > recommend once a day. A dependant package, python-publicsuffix, offers a > fetch() function which is explained in a blog: >

Bug#879008: publicsuffix: effective_tld_names.dat is not upgraded

2017-10-18 Thread Alessandro Vesely
Package: publicsuffix Version: 20170424.0717-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, at publicsuffix.org they recommend to avoid downloading the list too often, and recommend once a day. A dependant package, python-publicsuffix, offers a fetch() function which is explained in a blog: