Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + patch
Hi Wookey and YunQiang,
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:10:25PM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Wooky, this patch should work for the dpkg-cross package in repo.
>
> @James:
> >YunQiang, you still haven't told me why we need to do any of these
> >dpkg-cross changes (I'
Wooky, this patch should work for the dpkg-cross package in repo.
@James:
>YunQiang, you still haven't told me why we need to do any of these
>dpkg-cross changes (I'm referring to #881687 as well as this bug). What
>exactly was the problem that lead you to submitting #881687? I can't see
>the bug
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:18:29 +0800 YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:51:20 + James Cowgill wrote:
> > Hi YunQiang,
> >
> > On 14/11/17 03:34, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > Package: dpkg-cross
> > > Version: 2.6.15-2
> > >
> > > the ld.so.1 of n32 and 64 should be in
> > > lib32 and
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:51:20 + James Cowgill wrote:
> Hi YunQiang,
>
> On 14/11/17 03:34, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-cross
> > Version: 2.6.15-2
> >
> > the ld.so.1 of n32 and 64 should be in
> > lib32 and lib64.
> > We should not put them in
> > /usr/$(multiarch)/lib
> > as
Hi YunQiang,
On 14/11/17 03:34, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: dpkg-cross
> Version: 2.6.15-2
>
> the ld.so.1 of n32 and 64 should be in
> lib32 and lib64.
> We should not put them in
> /usr/$(multiarch)/lib
> as o32 will put its ld.so.1 their.
Are you sure this is correct? At least the
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:34:23AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: dpkg-cross
> Version: 2.6.15-2
>
> the ld.so.1 of n32 and 64 should be in
> lib32 and lib64.
> We should not put them in
> /usr/$(multiarch)/lib
> as o32 will put its ld.so.1 their.
>
> -
Package: dpkg-cross
Version: 2.6.15-2
the ld.so.1 of n32 and 64 should be in
lib32 and lib64.
We should not put them in
/usr/$(multiarch)/lib
as o32 will put its ld.so.1 their.
--- /usr/bin/dpkg-cross 2017-07-24 15:47:10.0 +
+++ dpkg-cross 2017-11-14 03:30:13.175812265 +
7 matches
Mail list logo
