On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Above syntax is wrong, you're missing a . between package and
> architectures, and version should be source version. Also if any of
> those packages build multi-arch: same binaries, this would break them.
> Overall it doesn't sound like an
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 17:51:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 debhelper 10.10.7 dbgsym regression fix rebuilds
>
> On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 14:17 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > There are probably several packages affected but I am not aware of
> > any easy mechanism to determine whi
Control: retitle -1 debhelper 10.10.7 dbgsym regression fix rebuilds
On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 14:17 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> There are probably several packages affected but I am not aware of
> any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6
It was pointed out
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
debhelper 10.10.7 fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that
prevented dbgsym packages from being generated. There are probably
several packages affected but I am not aware of any easy mech
4 matches
Mail list logo
