Hello,
On Sat, Feb 24 2018, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> After several months, I think we're repeating the same arguments and
> not really making any progress. So if you're unwilling to change, I
> suppose it's fine for this bug to be closed or wontfixed.
The next release of dgit will contain a tool
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> How so? Is there some difficulty with "git cherry-pick" or similar that I'm
> missing?
It is a problem for anyone who expects for Debian packaging to be
complete in the files provided in the Debian archives (
On 24/02/18 15:41, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
I've uploaded an updated pcre2 package (2 actually), which now points vcs-*
to salsa. I think this fixes this bug, so would like to close it, if that's
OK?
I appreciate that it
Hi,
I've uploaded an updated pcre2 package (2 actually), which now points
vcs-* to salsa. I think this fixes this bug, so would like to close it,
if that's OK?
On 01/12/17 18:49, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
The problem is that there is important metadata stored as git commits
(information about
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> I've uploaded an updated pcre2 package (2 actually), which now points vcs-*
> to salsa. I think this fixes this bug, so would like to close it, if that's
> OK?
I appreciate that it uses Vcs headers now. But my original
On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> I'm sorry you don't like dgit, and I am happy to try and make your life
> easier, but fundamentally I think it's a good workflow. I'm adjusting my
> workflow to more closely match that outlined in dgit-maint-merge(7),
>
Hi,
On 30/11/17 22:42, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Secondly, please add Vcs fields to your debian/control . That way
> someone doesn't have to find and read a README first. The Vcs fields
> have nice integration on pages like
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mdadm
Let me deal with this first. I've
Dear Jeremy,
On Thu, Nov 30 2017, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I filed https://bugs.debian.org/862425 which has now been closed. I
> kinda feel like my bug was hijacked by a dgit supporter.
I think that your assessment of how I responded to #862425 is unfair.
It was quite reasonable for you to
Control: retitle -1 pcre2: Please switch to 3.0 (quilt)
I filed https://bugs.debian.org/862425 which has now been closed. I
kinda feel like my bug was hijacked by a dgit supporter. pcre2 is the
first package I've noticed where dgit is used and to put it bluntly,
it hasn't left a good impression.
9 matches
Mail list logo