Hi,
Laurent Bigonville:
> if a policy creator wants to modify the policy he might need to modify this
> file as well same if a user is building his own kernel.
There's really no good reason why one would need to modify the default
file in /usr: the features-file that the parser uses is configured
On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 10:08:54 +0100 intrigeri wrote:
[...]
>
> I think we should:
>
> - move the features file to a non-conffile location ASAP: not only it
> makes little sense for it to be a conffile, but if I manage to get
> a pinned feature set in Stretch at some point you'll want this in
> ord
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:45:11AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Fabian Grünbichler:
> > sounds like a plan, I'll re-spin my patch later today.
>
> :)
>
see attached, tested on Sid with various modification scenarios. I think
the messages printed by apt are enough, and there should be no need for
a
Fabian Grünbichler:
> sounds like a plan, I'll re-spin my patch later today.
:)
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:08:54AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fabian Grünbichler:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:47:52AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> >> > I am not sure whether we are the only derivative/downstream/.. affected
> >> > by this change, but it has the potential to break a lot of s
Hi,
Fabian Grünbichler:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:47:52AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> > I am not sure whether we are the only derivative/downstream/.. affected
>> > by this change, but it has the potential to break a lot of setups using
>> > their own (more recent / patched to support more of AA
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:47:52AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - patch
> Control: severity -1 normal
>
> Hi,
hi (no need to CC me, I subscribe to all bugs I submit ;))
>
> Fabian Grünbichler:
> > see attached patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I didn't find a branch for the s-p-u upload (
Control: tag -1 - patch
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
Fabian Grünbichler:
> see attached patch.
Thanks!
> I didn't find a branch for the s-p-u upload (but
> that might just be my non-existing bzr skills failing me),
https://alioth.debian.org/scm/loggerhead/collab-maint/apparmor-stretch/chang
and actually attaching the patch this time
diff --git a/debian/patches/pin-feature-set.patch b/debian/patches/pin-feature-set.patch
index c12f1c4..0118aad 100644
--- a/debian/patches/pin-feature-set.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/pin-feature-set.patch
@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@ Author: intrigeri
+
+## Pin fe
Control: tags + patch
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 11:31:45AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fabian Grünbichler:
> > I am not sure whether the features file itself would really need to be a
> > conf file though, if it is already pointed to by a conf file directive?
> > putting the features file its
10 matches
Mail list logo
