2018-08-17 17:28 GMT+02:00 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
> Hi Manuel!
>
> The changelog entry in your NMU is a tad misleading as the changes are not
> specific to riscv64.
Yeah it's true, I was attaching what I knew at the time and with the
message that I put in the changelog, but the problem is
Hi Manuel!
The changelog entry in your NMU is a tad misleading as the changes are not
specific to riscv64.
Adrian
> On Aug 17, 2018, at 5:16 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
> wrote:
>
> Source: happy
> Version: 1.19.9-4
> Followup-For: Bug #884750
> User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
>
Source: happy
Version: 1.19.9-4
Followup-For: Bug #884750
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
Hi,
As Adrian said, this was still failing recently when bootstrapping riscv64.
We were working on it in parallel by mistake, and I attach the patch that I got,
basically the same.
I
Package: src:happy
Followup-For: Bug #884750
Hi!
This is trivially fixed with the following patch:
--- debian/rules~ 2018-04-09 21:06:48.0 +0200
+++ debian/rules2018-07-25 14:21:27.034989036 +0200
@@ -15,9 +15,6 @@
ifneq (,$(filter stage1,$(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)))
Source: happy
Version: 1.19.8-1
Severity: normal
>From my pbuilder build log, trying to bootstrap the package with a
tsage1 build profile:
...
fakeroot debian/rules clean
CDBS WARNING: copyright-check disabled - touch debian/copyright_hints
to enable.
test -x debian/rules
cp -a
5 matches
Mail list logo
